![]() Some smokers argue that banning smoking in public places is direct impingement of their human rights but this line is futile because right to smoking is not absolute, but right to life is. The doom of asthmatics, pregnant women can we well imagined too. The main critical issue in this respect is that is anyone (child or adult) safe from passive smoking. Ingrained smokers are not destroying their own health but also of others. Cigarette smoking not only pollutes the air but also make non-smokers inhale the stale smoke imperiling their health too. The debatable point is that to what extent these steps have been succeeded to dissuade the smokers. The imposition of high taxes on nicotine based products has already been done to restrain this habit. Government is squandering astronomical sums for the treatment of pulmonary cancers and educating the populace from the dangers of smoking. Inveterate smokers pack up themselves with lung and oral cancer rather than from natural causes. To illustrate my point I will like to cite the fact that most of the people die due to cigarette smoking which contains nicotine. ![]() Medical science has fully supported the dangers of potential passive smoking. Many countries are realizing the dangers of passive smoking and are coming up with measures to curb the problems popping up with the passive smoking. What is your viewpoint, do you agree or disagree? Writing Ban on smoking in places is not only justified but also imperative. Topic 1 Smoking in public places should be banned. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |